This site is in permanent work. It will take infinite time until I put what I intend on it.
Please be patient. In the meantime you can consult Wiki on interferometry at
http://starryridge.com/mediawiki-1.9.1/index.php?title=Main_Page
Vladimir
Posted in PSI BATH INTERFEROMETER
Bath Phase Shift Interferometer (BPSI) requires several polarizing components. Two of them are linear polarizers, one is circular poarizer aka quarter wave plate (QWP) or retarder, and one is polarizing cube beam splitter. All optics in the interferometer must be very clean, free from scratches, in order to introduce least amount of wavefront deformations. Most used polarizing filters are plastic films and their surface is not particularly good or resistant to scratches. One source of good polarizing filters are filters for photographic cameras. They are made of polarizing films sandwiched between two glass plates. That makes them well protected and easy for cleaning. Used or even new filters of this kind can be obtained cheep and are recommended for amateur use. Polarizing filters for camera objectives come in holders which are screwed to the objective and can be rotated which makes them particularly suitable for PSI Bath. Polarizing filters for cameras come in two varieties. Old style (film) cameras use linearly polarized filters, while digital cameras use circularly polarizing filters which are made from linear polarizer and quarter wave plate sandwiched between glass plates.
This is ray tracing of the Bath interferometer consisting of 10 mm beam splitter cube , a flat front surface mirror and diverging lens of 10 mm focal length, 7 mm diameter and 1.5 index of refraction, as used in testing the 850 mm ROC spherical mirror. Laser beam width is 2 mm.The interferograms associated with each interferometer-mirror setting are synthesized as a Young two point source interference pattern corresponding to the actual position of final foci of the test and reference beams as seen on the each image text. In rendering images, refraction on the beam splitter cube sides was not considered. refraction in lens and reflections on the splitter diagonal was used in ray tracing of the light beams . Real case differs because the conics, other than spheres, usually paraboloids, have spherical aberration when tested from ROC which modifies the interference pattern.
Quantitative values of change of the mirror positions, relative to the interferometer and resulting change in interferograms are instructive to get feeling for the amount of adjustments required in xyz translational stages on which the interferometer usually rests. It also demonstrates that adjustments can be divided so that for example longitudinal movement (z- axis) is done on interferometer and transverse (x,y axes) by the moving the mirror under test (or some other combination). Please note the difference in sensitivity to transverse movement compared to the longitudinal.
The interferogram analysis program OpenFringe (from David Rowe and Dale Eason) is offering several methods. Most recent (status April, 2015.) is Fourier transform based, which works best on large number of not much curved and not closed fringes (because in this case separation of fringes from noise is efficient) , like in image 7. More on this in Wiki:
http://starryridge.com/mediawiki-1.9.1/index.php?title=Main_Page
Zernike coefficients for astigmatism obtained from Bath interferometry
contain astigmatism on the glass, stand induced astigmatism
Bath interferometer induced instrumental astigmatism.
method to separate them was suggested by Dale Eason and is known
as derotation method. His analysis program incorporates this method.
I will here describe variation of this method as I am using it with PSI-Bath
interferometer (Phase Shifting Interferometry). I have already posted first results on two small mirrors
one of 83 mm diameter f/5, 1:3.3 thickness to diameter ratio, and another
one 115 mm diameter f/4.5, 1:6.2 ratio.
The mirrors are small and thick and tested with optical axis vertical so not
much stand deformation was expected.
In the meantime another mirror was obtained, 200 mm, f/4, 1: 8 ratio and
the method was tested on this one.
Mirror was resting on Plop designed 6 point cell. 4 rotations were used.
0, 45, 90 and 135 degrees (approximately, exact values are not required
by the method). Since angular part of astigmatism polynomials is sin(2 theta)
and cos( 2 theta), mirror astigmatism from rotations was oriented 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees.
For each rotation 10 interferograms phase shifted by 72 degrees, were made.
By using Stephen’s running method and Michael’s 5 phase cycle PSI analysis
program, it was possible to make 6 cycles from 10 shifted interferograms. interferograms 1 to 5, 2 to 6, 3 to 7, 4 to 8, 5 to 9 and 6 to 10
So I have 6 results for each rotation (24 in total).
Analysis program provided Z4 (x-ast) and Z5 (y-ast) components which were
plotted y-ast versus x-ast . Resulting plot is here, and in my Photos folder of
Interferometry group.
Photos, Vladimir Galogaza.
How did you determine this uncertainty of +- .003 waves?
I have made 6 interferometric measurements for each of four rotations.
That brings total of 24 pairs of Zernike astigmatism coefficients.
Fitting circle to measurements points is kind of averaging and circle
center is averaged results for all 24 points.
Circle radius is averaged mirror astigmatism. Distance from circle
center to each of measurement points is individual result.
The error is maximal deviation of all individual results from mean value
of all individual results.
Michael Peck told me that modified rotation method can also determine higher
order astigmatism . I have tried it with previous measurements and quality of
data was low enough to spoil such determination.
With my latest measurements, secondary astigmatism determination could
be estimated while tertiary failed, as demonstrated in the following three graphs.
(If the graphs are stripped in archives they can be found in my Photos album
Interferometry@yahoogroups.). This is one more demonstration of the superiority of the PSI-Bath (Phase Shift Bath Interferometry) data quality (IMO).
Michael Peck upgraded his PSI analysis programs with option for elimination of instrumental aberrations like stand induced astigmatism, trefoil and higher. Mirror rotation angles should be known and used as input data together with interferograms and maximum order of aberrations to be handled.
Posted in 1
Interferogram with this interferometer
Bath interferometer is very small. To further reduce its size to essentials, I have eliminated holders for lens and folding flat by gluing them to the beam splitter cube. Cube is 15 mm on side, the diverging lens is plano convex, 9 mm diameter (cut on one side to enable smaller beam separation), 21mm focal length. Folding flat is right angle prism, 6mm.Laser for the interferograms was green diode laser pointer. Interferogram pictures are from hand-held DSLR camera (exposition 1/800 sec). Beam separation for this unit was 6 mm. Lens and prism were glued to the cube with Norland Optical Adhesive 60, hardened with UV light.
Intensity of the green diode laser can be changed by variable serial resistor in power supply. The graph shows dependence of laser intensity on serial resistance. This laser has power stabilization cirsuit which has not prevented intensity controll . Power stabilization action is visible when input voltage is close to nominal value (3 V for this usnit) by leveling off the curve for small resistance.
Posted in MISCELLANEOUS
DSLR camera with telephoto lens 105 mm, KLB mirror
Interferogram taken with lensles camera (without objective) directly on the sensor, note fringe distortion at the edge of the interferogram. Distortion is caused by the light diffracted from the edge of the mirror under test . Camera objective (lens) is focusing this diffracted light back to the edge of the interferogram image, if camera is focused on the mirror. Focusing the camera on the mirror under test is first step in the interferometer setup procedure.
Posted in 1
